V
vwgtiturbo
Guest
Hello fellow Tuxers! First visit here, after sailing along on my own, and finally have a need for outside intervention.
I have a Linux server (headless) that I use for, among other things, storage of my Apple Lossless files (for access from iTunes on a Mac Laptop, if that matters).
I also maintain an MP3 copy of this library in my laptop itself, for syncing to an iPod and SD card for listening to music on my truck stereo.
I've noticed recently that there are quite a few artifacts in my MP3s (all converted to MP3 by iTunes) and am wondering...
Back in the day (mid 2000's) there was quite a debate concerning the quality of MP3s produced by iTunes, versus those produced by LAME. Is that still an issue? Is there a difference in the resulting file quality of one over the other?
I'm debating recoverting the Apple Lossless to MP3 using LAME (keeping the ALAC, just making another 2nd set for iPod/SD) in an attempt at reducing artifacts and increasing the quality of my MP3 collection, but am nut sure if it is a moot point after all of these years (I.e. I don't know if iTunes converter has improved and is now on par with LAME).
I thought about ditching MP3 altogether (since the truck stereo is certainly good enough for lossless), but the stereo only supports WAV for lossless (WAV doesn't support tagging, does it? It's been a while since I ditched WAV and at the time, it didn't...).
Any insight would be awesome. I need some professional guidance! Thanks in advance
I have a Linux server (headless) that I use for, among other things, storage of my Apple Lossless files (for access from iTunes on a Mac Laptop, if that matters).
I also maintain an MP3 copy of this library in my laptop itself, for syncing to an iPod and SD card for listening to music on my truck stereo.
I've noticed recently that there are quite a few artifacts in my MP3s (all converted to MP3 by iTunes) and am wondering...
Back in the day (mid 2000's) there was quite a debate concerning the quality of MP3s produced by iTunes, versus those produced by LAME. Is that still an issue? Is there a difference in the resulting file quality of one over the other?
I'm debating recoverting the Apple Lossless to MP3 using LAME (keeping the ALAC, just making another 2nd set for iPod/SD) in an attempt at reducing artifacts and increasing the quality of my MP3 collection, but am nut sure if it is a moot point after all of these years (I.e. I don't know if iTunes converter has improved and is now on par with LAME).
I thought about ditching MP3 altogether (since the truck stereo is certainly good enough for lossless), but the stereo only supports WAV for lossless (WAV doesn't support tagging, does it? It's been a while since I ditched WAV and at the time, it didn't...).
Any insight would be awesome. I need some professional guidance! Thanks in advance