I have been using BalenaEtcher to burn Kali to a stick which I can just work off, however upon the finish I just a failed message and then a warning that the checksum is wrong. I dont understand why or how this happens.
I would also advise that Kali is not for those new to Linux if your not experienced with Linux Kali is not the right distro for you.'How to Verify a Linux ISO’s Checksum and Confirm It Hasn’t Been Tampered With
Last month, Linux Mint’s website was hacked, and a modified ISO was put up for download that included a backdoor. While the problem was fixed quickly, it demonstrates the importance of checking Linux ISO files you download before running and installing them. Here’s how.www.howtogeek.com
I have used Linux before, used Mint and Zorin. I have burned to sticks before (not live boot though) not had issues, how can there be a problem with the checksum issue if i got it directly off the website?Did you check your download to make sure it was good?
Try a different stick they do go bad sometimes.
I would also advise that Kali is not for those new to Linux if your not experienced with Linux Kali is not the right distro for you.
Well downloads can be bad too. So re download and check the checksum before burning.I have used Linux before, used Mint and Zorin. I have burned to sticks before (not live boot though) not had issues, how can there be a problem with the checksum issue if i got it directly off the website?
USB stick is brand new out the boxit simply tells you that the download is corrupted in some way. Experience will tell you that. (either that or your usb stick is kaput)
Download it via a torrent file
I got them off the same site I always do, not some random one, unless thats been highjacked.Well downloads can be bad too. So re download and check the checksum before burning.
was the checksum good? Try a different iso burner.I got them off the same site I always do, not some random one, unless thats been highjacked.
I got them off the same site I always do,...
https://www.kali.org/get-kali/#kali-platforms this one and gone for the live boot option. There does not appear to be any other places anyway that are not just "free download here" that I wont touch.and which site is that, pray tell?
Wiz
The slightest glitch in transmission across thousands of miles of cable and through multiple servers can cause a corruption to happen, it isn't often but nonetheless does happen, try downloading again when your location is at its lowest usage [late night/early morning]how can there be a problem with the checksum issue if i got it directly off the website?
wow, thats crazyThe slightest glitch in transmission across thousands of miles of cable and through multiple servers can cause a corruption to happen, it isn't often but nonetheless does happen, try downloading again when your location is at its lowest usage [late night/early morning]
Why how much cable would you need [and connections] to connect just to your regular sites, Packet routing is the quickest although complicated way,wow, thats crazy
sudo dd if="linuxmint-22-cinnamon-64bit.iso" of=/dev/sdX status=progress conv=fsync
fsync
needed, why not just fdatasync
?There is really not much difference between the two except for how each cache's the files; fsync guarantees that the file's modification time will be updated, fdatasync does not; it guarantees only that the file's data will be written. This means that in principal, fdatasync can execute faster than fsync because it needs to force only one disk write instead of two that fsync does. I just prefer fsync because of this@GatorsFan
Question, why isfsync
needed, why not justfdatasync
?
I understand the later also writes metadata, but why is that needed? will boot loader complain if metadata is missing?
There does not appear to be any other places anyway that are not just "free download here" that I wont touch.