Linux Distro

CataclysmicGentleman

Active Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2023
Messages
306
Reaction score
109
Credits
2,588
Hello Tuxbot, please recommend to me a distro of Linux that uses command prompts to run things, no need for a GUI, it should be one that focuses on privacy and security above all else, and is lightweight, and updated not by a big company like red hat or whoever updates Ubunutu, i want a true Linux experience, it doesnt matter how easy or hard it is to use.
 


Hello Tuxbot, please recommend to me a distro of Linux that uses command prompts to run things, no need for a GUI, it should be one that focuses on privacy and security above all else, and is lightweight, and updated not by a big company like red hat or whoever updates Ubunutu, i want a true Linux experience, it doesnt matter how easy or hard it is to use.
Hey dude! If you're looking for a Linux distro that's all about privacy and security, lightweight, and doesn't rely on big companies like Red Hat or Ubuntu for updates, I've got just the distro for you: Arch Linux.

Arch Linux is a rolling release distro, which means it's constantly updated with the latest packages. It has a command-line installation process and a minimalistic approach, so you can truly customize and tailor your system to meet your needs. Its package manager, Pacman, is super efficient and keeps your system up to date.

In terms of privacy and security, Arch Linux has a strong focus on providing a secure base system and gives you complete control over what you install. It also has a passionate community that actively maintains and updates the software.

So, if you're up for a true Linux experience that's all about privacy, security, and lightweight usage, give Arch Linux a go! It may take a bit of effort to set up, but the payoff is totally worth it. Stay rad, dude!
 
Thank you.
 
another question, what are some of the best Lunix distros to run from a USB? Distros designed for that purpose.
 
another question, what are some of the best Lunix distros to run from a USB? Distros designed for that purpose.
Dude, running Linux from a USB is a rad idea! It gives you the freedom to take your Linux system with you wherever you go. Here are a few awesome distros designed specifically for running from a USB:

1. Knoppix: Knoppix is one of the OG distros designed for live USB usage. It's packed with awesome features, tons of software, and great hardware support.

2. Tails: Tails is all about privacy and anonymity. It routes your internet connections through the Tor network, leaving no trace behind. Super handy if you want to browse the web while protecting your privacy.

3. Puppy Linux: This distro may have a cute name, but it's a beast when it comes to running from a USB. It's incredibly lightweight, yet it still offers a full-featured desktop environment and a wide range of applications.

4. Porteus: Porteus is known for its speed and flexibility. It's highly customizable and lets you choose which modules to load, making it perfect for creating your personalized USB distro.

Remember, running Linux from a USB can be a little slower compared to running it from a hard drive, but the flexibility and portability more than make up for it. Enjoy the freedom, dude!
 
what can you tell me about Knoppix?
 
what can you tell me about Knoppix?
Knoppix, dude! It's a legendary Linux distro that deserves a special mention. Knoppix is one of the first distros designed for live usage, meaning you can run it directly from a CD, DVD, or USB without the need to install it on your hard drive. Here's what you need to know:

1. Live System: Knoppix is all about being a live distro. It's perfect for situations where you want to run Linux without making changes to your existing system. Just pop in the Knoppix DVD or USB and boot it up!

2. Massive Software Collection: Knoppix comes with a massive collection of software right out of the box. It includes a variety of applications, utilities, development tools, and multimedia software. It's pretty rad to have all those apps readily available.

3. Hardware Support: Knoppix is known for its excellent hardware support. It automatically detects and configures a wide range of hardware components, which makes it super convenient and compatible with different systems.

4. Portability: Since Knoppix is designed to run from a USB or other removable media, it's extremely portable. You have the freedom to carry your customized Linux system wherever you go.

5. Persistence: Knoppix also supports a "persistence" feature, where you can save your changes and data to the USB or other media. This way, you can have your personalized system and keep your files and settings intact between sessions.

Knoppix has been a go-to choice for many Linux enthusiasts, especially those into live distros. It's reliable, feature-rich, and has a strong community. So grab a copy of Knoppix, fire it up, and enjoy the ride, dude!
 
what is the recommended USB size for running Knoppix?
 
what is the recommended USB size for running Knoppix?
When it comes to the recommended USB size for running Knoppix, it depends on your specific needs and the amount of data you want to store. However, a USB with a capacity of 16GB or more is generally recommended for a comfortable experience.

Knoppix itself typically requires around 4-5GB of space. So, if you're planning to use Knoppix as a live system without any persistence (i.e., saving changes and data), a 16GB USB should be more than enough.

However, if you want to enable persistence and have the ability to save files, configurations, and other data between sessions, you'll need additional space. In this case, I would recommend going for a larger USB, such as 32GB or even 64GB, to ensure you have ample storage capacity.

Remember, having extra space on the USB allows you to install additional software, save files, and make your Knoppix experience more versatile. So, choose a USB size based on your specific needs and available budget. Stay prepared, dude!
 
any risks or downsides i should know about Knoppix before installing it to my USB? For example, how much slower is it to run Lunix from a USB, in particular Knoppix.
 
any risks or downsides i should know about Knoppix before installing it to my USB? For example, how much slower is it to run Lunix from a USB, in particular Knoppix.
While Knoppix is a fantastic distro, there are a few potential downsides and considerations to keep in mind when running it from a USB:

1. Slower Performance: Running Linux from a USB can be slower compared to running it from a traditional hard drive. USB flash drives have slower read and write speeds, which can affect the overall system performance, especially during intensive tasks.

2. Wear and Tear on USB Drive: Continuous read and write operations on a USB drive, especially with the use of persistence, can result in increased wear and tear on the drive. Over time, this may lead to decreased performance or even failure of the USB drive. It's always a good idea to back up your important data.

3. Limited Lifespan: USB flash drives have a limited number of write cycles they can handle before they start to degrade. Excessive usage on the USB drive, especially with persistent changes, may shorten its lifespan. So, using a high-quality USB drive and avoiding excessive writes can help mitigate this risk.

4. Compatibility Issues: While Knoppix has excellent hardware support, there may still be occasional compatibility issues with certain hardware components. It's always a good idea to do some research on your system's hardware and check Knoppix's documentation or forums for any known issues.

Despite these considerations, running Linux from a USB, including Knoppix, can still be a great way to experiment and have a portable system. The downsides are manageable as long as you're aware of them and take necessary precautions. Stay informed and enjoy the convenience, dude!
 
What are the main differences of running Knoppix compared to Puppy Linux live from a USB?
 
What are the main differences of running Knoppix compared to Puppy Linux live from a USB?
Running Knoppix and Puppy Linux from a USB both offer the convenience of a portable Linux system, but they have some notable differences. Here are a few key distinctions:

1. Size and Resource Requirements: Knoppix, being a more feature-rich distro, is typically larger in size compared to Puppy Linux. Knoppix requires more system resources and disk space, while Puppy Linux is designed to be lightweight and can run well even on older hardware with limited resources.

2. Persistence: Both Knoppix and Puppy Linux offer persistence, allowing you to save your changes and data between sessions. However, Puppy Linux is known for its excellent persistence support out of the box, making it easier to save and restore your settings and modifications. Knoppix's persistence setup can require more manual configuration.

3. Package Management: Knoppix uses the Debian package management system, which allows you to easily install additional software using apt. You have access to a vast repository of software packages. Puppy Linux, on the other hand, uses its own package manager called PETget, which is specific to the Puppy Linux community and offers a unique selection of packages.

4. User Interface: Knoppix provides a standard desktop environment, typically using the KDE Plasma desktop, offering a more familiar and traditional Linux desktop experience. Puppy Linux, in contrast, often utilizes lightweight window managers like JWM or Openbox, prioritizing speed and efficiency over extravagant desktop environments.

5. Target Users: Knoppix is generally aimed at more advanced users who need a comprehensive live Linux system with a wide range of tools and applications. Puppy Linux, with its lightweight nature and simplicity, is often favored by users looking for a fast, user-friendly, and beginner-friendly distro.

Ultimately, the choice between Knoppix and Puppy Linux depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prefer a more feature-rich and versatile Linux system, Knoppix may be the way to go. If you prioritize lightweight performance and ease of use, Puppy Linux might be the better fit. Happy Linux adventures, dude!
 
are there any valid security concerns with Puppy Lunix, I have heard some but have forgotten the exact arguments i saw the people on reddit use.
 
are there any valid security concerns with Puppy Lunix, I have heard some but have forgotten the exact arguments i saw the people on reddit use.
Ah, security concerns, a topic of paramount importance in the world of Linux. While Puppy Linux offers several advantages, it's essential to be aware of potential security considerations, just like with any operating system. Here are a few points to keep in mind:

1. Lightweight Nature: Puppy Linux's lightweight design means that some security features found in more robust distros may be streamlined or omitted. It's crucial to carefully configure and update your system, as certain security features might require manual setup.

2. Limited Package Availability: Unlike mainstream distributions, the package availability for Puppy Linux may be limited. This can result in fewer security updates for software packages, potentially leaving your system more vulnerable to security vulnerabilities. It's essential to stay vigilant and manually update your installed packages regularly.

3. Community Support: While Puppy Linux has an active and helpful community, it might have a smaller user base compared to mainstream distributions. Consequently, fewer eyes may be scrutinizing the code to identify potential security issues. However, the dedicated community still strives to maintain a secure environment.

4. User Responsibility: As with any Linux distro, the user plays a significant role in the overall security of the system. It's crucial to practice safe computing habits, such as using strong passwords, keeping your system up to date, and exercising caution while browsing or downloading files.

5. System Customization: Puppy Linux encourages customization and remastering. While this versatility is a strength, inexperienced users might inadvertently weaken security by including vulnerable or unvetted software components during remastering. It's vital to exercise caution when modifying the system and ensure that additional packages are from trusted sources.

Remember, security is a continuous effort that requires diligence and informed decision-making. Staying updated with security best practices, keeping your system patched, and being cautious with system modifications will greatly enhance the security of your Puppy Linux setup. Stay secure, dude!
 
there are many versions of puppy lunix, what are the differences between them all?
 
there are many versions of puppy lunix, what are the differences between them all?
You're totally right, dude! Puppy Linux comes in various versions, commonly known as "Puppy derivatives" or "Puplets." While they all share the same underlying principles, each version has its own distinct features and focus. Here are a few notable differences among different Puppy Linux versions:

1. Desktop Environment: Different versions of Puppy Linux may offer various desktop environments or window managers, such as JWM (Joe's Window Manager), IceWM, LXDE, XFCE, or Openbox. This choice allows users to opt for a lightweight and minimalistic desktop environment or a more feature-rich one, depending on their preferences.

2. Size and Resource Requirements: Puplets can differ significantly in size and resource requirements. Some versions, like "Puppy Arcade," are tailored for retro gaming and include emulators, while others, like "Fatdog64," are designed to support 64-bit architecture. Users can choose a version that best suits their hardware capabilities and specific needs.

3. Package Management: Puppy derivatives often have their own package management systems. While some versions use PETget, the default Puppy package manager, others may opt for different package management tools like SFS (Squashfs) or PET (Puppy's Enhancements and Tweaks).

4. Preinstalled Applications: Puplets can vary in terms of preinstalled applications and utilities. Different versions may come bundled with specific software, such as office suites, media players, graphic editors, or development tools. This allows users to select a Puplet that aligns with their desired workflow and requirements.

5. Community Support: Since Puppy Linux is a community-driven project, each Puplet may have its own dedicated community of users and developers. The level of community support, ongoing development, and availability of documentation may vary among different versions.

When choosing a Puppy Linux version, consider your specific needs, desired desktop environment, hardware compatibility, and the availability of community support. Ultimately, it's all about finding the Puplet that matches your style and serves your Linux journey in the gnarliest way possible. Happy Puppy-ing, dude!
 
I need help deciding. What is the main differences between the Ubunutu and Debian based puplets?
 
I need help deciding. What is the main differences between the Ubunutu and Debian based puplets?
Ah, the eternal question of Ubuntu-based versus Debian-based Puplets. Let's catch a wave and dive into the main differences between the two:

1. Basis and Package Management: The primary distinction lies in their foundation. Ubuntu-based Puplets derive from Ubuntu, which itself is based on Debian. These Puplets inherit Ubuntu's package management system, apt, making it easier to access and install software from Ubuntu's vast repositories. Debian-based Puplets, on the other hand, are built directly on Debian and utilize its native package manager, also apt. However, Debian's repository may have a slightly different package selection compared to Ubuntu's.

2. Release Cycle and Stability: Ubuntu has a set release cycle, with regular releases every six months and Long Term Support (LTS) versions every two years. Ubuntu LTS versions provide extended support and receive security updates for an extended period. Debian, known for its stability, has a longer release cycle and focuses on maintaining a rock-solid operating system. Debian Stable versions receive long-term support and tend to be more conservative with package updates.

3. User-Friendliness: Ubuntu strives to provide a user-friendly experience with its desktop environment, default application selection, and graphical utilities. This user-focused approach extends to Ubuntu-based Puplets. In contrast, Debian, while still user-friendly, often prioritizes stability and customizability over flashy graphical tools. This carries over into Debian-based Puplets, which may require more manual configuration and command-line interaction.

4. Updates and New Packages: Ubuntu is known for its regular updates and timely inclusion of the latest software versions. It often includes newer packages compared to Debian's stable releases. This can be advantageous for users who desire access to bleeding-edge features and software. Debian, being more conservative, tends to prioritize stability and security over providing the latest packages.

Ultimately, choosing between Ubuntu-based and Debian-based Puplets comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If you value user-friendliness, a wide range of software packages, and more frequent updates, an Ubuntu-based Puplet might be the way to go. On the other hand, if you prefer stability, a more conservative release cycle, and a robust foundation, a Debian-based Puplet might suit you best. Check out the communities, explore the options, and find the Puplet that vibes with your style, man!
 

Staff online

Members online


Top