I had an eye-opening experience the other day which has served to increase my dislike of Ubuntu's snaps.
[Part 1]
Snaps have pros, but they have more cons. I can attest to the fact that they look ugly, since they don't match your system theme. They also take up lots of disk space, and some people have reported slower start times for apps when they use snaps.
[Part 2]
As an amateur programmer, I have been contributing to the nheko app (it's a client for the Matrix messaging protocol). Building nheko can take a lot of time, CPU, and RAM, and when a build uses lots of CPU and RAM, your system tends to lock up to a certain extent. I experimented with limiting the rate at which the program built, but I still experienced lockups. Then one day, I opened htop in a different tty display and found something completely unexpected: The snap daemon (snapd) was using about 35% of my CPU. I completely removed snap, and as far as I can recall, I haven't had a lockup since.
Anybody else have reasons tohate dislike snaps?
[Part 1]
Snaps have pros, but they have more cons. I can attest to the fact that they look ugly, since they don't match your system theme. They also take up lots of disk space, and some people have reported slower start times for apps when they use snaps.
[Part 2]
As an amateur programmer, I have been contributing to the nheko app (it's a client for the Matrix messaging protocol). Building nheko can take a lot of time, CPU, and RAM, and when a build uses lots of CPU and RAM, your system tends to lock up to a certain extent. I experimented with limiting the rate at which the program built, but I still experienced lockups. Then one day, I opened htop in a different tty display and found something completely unexpected: The snap daemon (snapd) was using about 35% of my CPU. I completely removed snap, and as far as I can recall, I haven't had a lockup since.
Anybody else have reasons to
Last edited: