`how did you arrive at that conclusion ?....do you have numbers ? I would be most interested to see themvery small number of linux desktop users in existence
as there is no creditable way of accurately measuring how many people worldwide use some form of Linux, I always think this is a non-starter for an argument.despite the very small number of linux desktop users in existence,
Not everyone is the same shape, so why should they have to put up with an ill-fitting suite, the same with computer systems, why put up with something that doesn't fit when you can Taylor make it to fit your own circumstances, variety gives you that opportunitythere's such a huge amount of software we have to choose from.
A total of 5.35 billion people around the world were using the internet at the start of 2024, equivalent to 66.2 percent of the world's total population. Internet users continue to grow too, with the latest data indicating that the world's connected population grew by 97 million users in the 12 months to January 2024.
That has nothing to do with my question.How many components in a car?
I do appreciate that nobody trusts statistics, but it doesn't appear you have discovered google's conflicting info.`how did you arrive at that conclusion ?....do you have numbers ? I would be most interested to see them
I'm actually shocked that despite the very small number of linux desktop users in existence, there's such a huge amount of software we have to choose from. Why is this?
Doesn't seem to be a problem so far: open source licenses are structured in such a way that anyone could do it.In addition, Linux still isn't sold with hardware, which will be their downfall if they don't realize this.
Greetings Diputs,That basically is because everybody is re-inventing the same wheel, in this world this is known as "distro"
And that divides the number of users extremely.
In addition, Linux still isn't sold with hardware, which will be their downfall if they don't realize this.
One Distro at least is, and it's big in the corporate world. It may not be the "best" Distro (who's to judge ?), but it will exist in 20 years, which we can't say from others.
Just a reminder, ALL Unix OS'es (which could technically be described as some kind of Linux distro), still exist, and that is because they understand how the world used to work. You wouldn't realize how many servers still run Unix. And technically there are less good as Linux (well, in 2024 that is, but not in 1984), but the discussion is not about quality.
Technically, that's the wrong way round. Charlie's got the right of it; Unix existed long before Linux did, so your statement that Unix OSes are all forms of Linux makes no sense whatsoever, I'm afraid!Just a reminder, ALL Unix OS'es (which could technically be described as some kind of Linux distro), still exist, and that is because they understand how the world used to work.
Hello Vimmer,I'm actually shocked that despite the very small number of linux desktop users in existence, there's such a huge amount of software we have to choose from. Why is this?
It would be a very dull world if everyone drove a Ford.That basically is because everybody is re-inventing the same wheel, in this world this is known as "distro"
Do you think we have too much? What would you eliminate?I'm actually shocked that despite the very small number of linux desktop users in existence, there's such a huge amount of software we have to choose from. Why is this?
Linux pretty much started out life as a hacker's hobby. It grew as it attracted more hobbyist hackers. It was quite some time before anybody but a geek stood a chance of getting a useable Linux installation working easily. Linux started out "By geeks, for geeks." And even today, the majority of established Linux users are self-confessed geeks.
And that's a pretty good thing: If you've got a problem with hardware or software, having a large number of geeks available to work on the solution is a definite plus.
But Linux has grown up quite a bit since its early days. There are distros that almost anybody can install, even distros that live on CDs and detect all your hardware for you without any intervention. It's become attractive to non-hobbyist users who are just interested in it because it's virus-free and cheap to upgrade. It's not uncommon for there to be friction between the two camps. It's important to bear in mind, however, that there's no real malice on either side: It's lack of understanding that causes the problems.
Firstly, you get the hard-core geeks who still assume that everybody using Linux is a fellow geek. This means they expect a high level of knowledge, and this often leads to accusations of arrogance, elitism, and rudeness. And in truth, sometimes that's what it is. But quite often, it's not: It's elitist to say "Everybody ought to know this". It's not elitist to say "Everybody knows this" - quite the opposite.
Secondly, you get the new users who're trying to make the switch after a lifetime of using commercial OSes. These users are used to software that anybody can sit down & use, out-of-the-box.
The issues arise because group 1 is made up of people who enjoy being able to tear their OS apart and rebuild it the way they like it, while group 2 tends to be indifferent to the way the OS works, so long as it does work.
Have a look here - https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide`how did you arrive at that conclusion ?....do you have numbers ? I would be most interested to see them
I've seen that one yet it seems a little unreliable since it just says "linux". But i guess you go with FreeBSD if you want to go even deeper into the cave...Have a look here - https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide
course I do not know how accurate this is but seems relatively close to me for your average desktop user